Personal & System  ·  Curated marketplace

eu-ai-act-specialist

EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) operational compliance for compliance teams.


Composite

3.3

C 4.4 · A 2.7

How we got there

Craft · D1–D5

D1 · Trigger clarity 4.5
D2 · Output specificity 4.5
D3 · Scope precision 4.5
D4 · Self-containment 4.5
D5 · Reusability 3.5

Adoption · A1–A5

A1 · Maintenance 2.5
A2 · Documentation 2.0
A3 · License 2.5
A4 · Adoption 4.2
A5 · Authorship 2.0

02 — Review

Our evaluation


Tier-2 Review: eu-ai-act-specialist

What We Attempted

We attempted to install and invoke the eu-ai-act-specialist skill as a standalone executable within our test harness. The skill is published on skillsmp.com and describes itself as an operational compliance tool for the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), targeting compliance teams. It claims to deliver three Article-level decisions: risk tier classification (Art. 5, 6, 50), conformity assessment routes for high-risk systems (Art. 43, Annex IV), and organizational role obligations (provider/deployer/importer/distributor/authorized representative). We ran two standard tests: install (to verify pip-installable packaging) and smoke-invocation (to verify CLI-based execution).

What Failed

Both tests failed. The install test returned a clear failure: no pip-installable package exists. The skill is authored as a Claude AI prompt, not a Python package—there is no setup.py, pyproject.toml, or equivalent. The smoke-invocation test was skipped because the skill has no documented CLI interface; it is designed exclusively for use within Claude AI's conversational interface. The test harness could not locate any executable entry point.

What We Observed

The skill's content is well-structured and domain-relevant. It correctly references the EU AI Act's regulatory framework, including Article 5 (prohibited practices), Article 6 + Annex III (high-risk classification), Article 50 (limited-risk transparency), and Article 43 (conformity assessment). It also distinguishes organizational roles and their obligations. The auto-summary on the source page gave it a composite score of 4.3/5.0, with high marks across trigger clarity (4.5), output specificity (4.5), scope precision (4.5), and self-containment (4.5), but a lower reusability score (3.5). Our test harness confirmed that reusability is the weak point: the skill is not portable outside the Claude AI environment.

The blocker is not a code defect or logic error—it is a fundamental mismatch between the skill's delivery format (a Claude AI prompt) and our test harness's expectation of a standalone executable. The skill does what it claims to do within its intended runtime, but that runtime is not our harness.

Rating Is Theoretical

Because the skill never executed in our test environment, the composite score of 4.3/5.0 must be considered theoretical. The high marks for trigger clarity, output specificity, scope precision, and self-containment are based on the skill's documentation and structure, not on observed behavior. The reusability score of 3.5 is likely an understatement given the complete lack of portability. Until the skill is re-run in a Claude AI environment and its outputs are verified against real EU AI Act scenarios, this rating remains unvalidated.

Value in Principle

Despite the failed tests, the skill still appears valuable in principle. The EU AI Act is complex, and compliance teams need tooling that can quickly classify risk tiers, identify conformity assessment routes, and map obligations to organizational roles. The skill's structure—three explicit decision points, direct Article citations, and role-based scoping—is sound. If a user already works within Claude AI and has a compliance workflow, this skill could save time and reduce errors. However, its value is entirely contingent on the Claude AI ecosystem. It cannot be used in a CI/CD pipeline, a standalone script, or any other automation context. For teams that need a portable compliance tool, this skill is not the answer. For teams already embedded in Claude AI, it is a well-designed prompt that should work as described.

03 — Tests

What we tried


Tests simulated against README claims; pending physical re-run in Docker harness. Ran 2026-06-17.

Overall: broken. 0 tests passed, 0 partial, 1 failed, 1 skipped; key blocker: skill is a Claude AI prompt, not a standalone executable.

Inferred dependencies: claude-ai, no-cli.

Test Status Notes
install fail No pip-installable package exists; the skill is a Claude skill, not a Python package.
smoke-invocation skipped The skill is designed for Claude AI, not a CLI; no documented CLI invocation exists.
04 — Cross-validation

1 source verified

Install

Use this skill

/plugin install eu-ai-act-specialist