01 — TL;DR
If you need output specificity above all else, pick investigate-ci (4.4/5). frontend-design (3.6/5) is a reasonable alternative if you're already in its source ecosystem. They overlap in CLI wrapper territory.
Side by side
3.6/5
4.4/5
Where they differ
- Trigger clarity. trigger clarity: frontend-design and investigate-ci score essentially the same (4.5 vs 4.5). Neither has an edge here.
- Output specificity. output specificity: investigate-ci is clearly stronger (4.0 vs 4.5). For workloads where this dimension matters, prefer investigate-ci.
- Scope precision. scope precision: frontend-design and investigate-ci score essentially the same (4.5 vs 4.5). Neither has an edge here.
- Self-containment. self-containment: frontend-design and investigate-ci score essentially the same (4.5 vs 4.5). Neither has an edge here.
- Reusability. reusability: frontend-design is clearly stronger (4.0 vs 3.5). For workloads where this dimension matters, prefer frontend-design.
Which to pick
When to choose frontend-design
- Your workload emphasizes reusability — frontend-design scores 4.0 vs 3.5 here.
- You prefer the official source — frontend-design comes from github:anthropics/skills, investigate-ci from skillsmp.com.
- Multi-source consensus matters to you — frontend-design appears in 2 of our tracked sources (investigate-ci: 1).
- You weight community adoption — frontend-design's upstream repo has 173,813 stars vs 48,595.
When to choose investigate-ci
- Your workload emphasizes output specificity — investigate-ci scores 4.0 vs 4.5 here.
- The CLI wrapper convention you're working in matches investigate-ci's scope.
Scenario by scenario
| Scenario | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Agent must auto-select between many CLI wrappers | either | Trigger clarity decides — clearer triggers reduce routing errors. |
| Output must be a specific file format or structured data | investigate-ci | Output specificity determines whether downstream tools can rely on the result. |
| Skill must be readable and complete out of the box | either | Self-containment matters when you're not the original author. |
| Cross-team or cross-project reuse expected | frontend-design | Reusability separates one-off scripts from durable building blocks. |
Common questions
- Which is better, frontend-design or investigate-ci?
- investigate-ci ranks higher overall (4.4 vs 3.6 on our 0–5 rubric). That said, the better choice depends on which dimensions matter most for your use case.
- Are frontend-design and investigate-ci both free to use?
- Both skills are free and open-source (or freely licensed). frontend-design: See source repo. investigate-ci: See source repo. Installation has no cost; usage costs depend on the underlying LLM tokens consumed when you invoke the skill.
- Can I install both frontend-design and investigate-ci at the same time?
- Yes. Agent skills are not exclusive — an agent runtime (Claude Code, Codex, etc.) can have many skills installed and route to whichever matches the current task. Installing both is a low-cost way to keep your options open.
- Where do these skills come from?
- frontend-design is sourced from github:anthropics/skills (official). investigate-ci is sourced from skillsmp.com (curated marketplace). We verify each skill across multiple sources where possible; frontend-design appears in 2 sources, investigate-ci in 1.