Compare · CLI & API Wrappers
figma-create-new-file vs mcp-security-audit
Which CLI wrapper is right for you?
Notable score gap. mcp-security-audit scores meaningfully higher; see individual reviews for nuance.
01 — TL;DR
If you need trigger clarity above all else, pick mcp-security-audit (4.4/5). figma-create-new-file (3.4/5) is a reasonable alternative if you're already in its source ecosystem. They overlap in CLI wrapper territory.
Side by side
3.4/5
4.4/5
Where they differ
- Trigger clarity. trigger clarity: mcp-security-audit is clearly stronger (4.5 vs 5.0). For workloads where this dimension matters, prefer mcp-security-audit.
- Output specificity. output specificity: figma-create-new-file is clearly stronger (4.5 vs 4.0). For workloads where this dimension matters, prefer figma-create-new-file.
- Scope precision. scope precision: figma-create-new-file and mcp-security-audit score essentially the same (4.5 vs 4.5). Neither has an edge here.
- Self-containment. self-containment: figma-create-new-file and mcp-security-audit score essentially the same (4.5 vs 4.5). Neither has an edge here.
- Reusability. reusability: mcp-security-audit is clearly stronger (3.0 vs 3.5). For workloads where this dimension matters, prefer mcp-security-audit.
Which to pick
When to choose figma-create-new-file
- Your workload emphasizes output specificity — figma-create-new-file scores 4.5 vs 4.0 here.
- You prefer the official source — figma-create-new-file comes from github:openai/skills, mcp-security-audit from skillsmp.com.
- The CLI wrapper convention you're working in matches figma-create-new-file's scope.
When to choose mcp-security-audit
- Your workload emphasizes trigger clarity — mcp-security-audit scores 4.5 vs 5.0 here.
- Your workload emphasizes reusability — mcp-security-audit scores 3.0 vs 3.5 here.
- You weight community adoption — mcp-security-audit's upstream repo has 33,186 stars vs 19,581.
Scenario by scenario
| Scenario | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Agent must auto-select between many CLI wrappers | mcp-security-audit | Trigger clarity decides — clearer triggers reduce routing errors. |
| Output must be a specific file format or structured data | figma-create-new-file | Output specificity determines whether downstream tools can rely on the result. |
| Skill must be readable and complete out of the box | either | Self-containment matters when you're not the original author. |
| Cross-team or cross-project reuse expected | mcp-security-audit | Reusability separates one-off scripts from durable building blocks. |
Common questions
- Which is better, figma-create-new-file or mcp-security-audit?
- mcp-security-audit ranks higher overall (4.4 vs 3.4 on our 0–5 rubric). That said, the better choice depends on which dimensions matter most for your use case.
- Are figma-create-new-file and mcp-security-audit both free to use?
- Both skills are free and open-source (or freely licensed). figma-create-new-file: See source repo. mcp-security-audit: See source repo. Installation has no cost; usage costs depend on the underlying LLM tokens consumed when you invoke the skill.
- Can I install both figma-create-new-file and mcp-security-audit at the same time?
- Yes. Agent skills are not exclusive — an agent runtime (Claude Code, Codex, etc.) can have many skills installed and route to whichever matches the current task. Installing both is a low-cost way to keep your options open.
- Where do these skills come from?
- figma-create-new-file is sourced from github:openai/skills (official). mcp-security-audit is sourced from skillsmp.com (curated marketplace). We verify each skill across multiple sources where possible; figma-create-new-file appears in 1 source, mcp-security-audit in 1.